9/28/2005

Choosing aliens over Americans

No matter what all the politicians and activists want, African-Americans and impoverished white Cajuns will not be first in line to rebuild the Katrina-ravaged Gulf Coast and New Orleans. Latino immigrants, many of them undocumented, will. And when they're done, they're going to stay, making New Orleans look like Los Angeles.

It's the federal government that will have made the transformation possible, further exposing the hollowness of the immigration debate.

President Bush has promised that Washington will pick up the greater part of the cost for "one of the largest reconstruction efforts the world has ever seen." To that end, he suspended provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act that would have required government contractors to pay prevailing wages in Louisiana and devastated parts of Mississippi, Alabama and Florida. And the Department of Homeland Security has temporarily suspended sanctioning employers who hire workers who cannot document their citizenship. The idea is to benefit Americans who may have lost everything in the hurricane, but the main effect will be to let contractors hire illegal immigrants.

Mexican and Central American laborers are already arriving in southeastern Louisiana. One construction firm based in Metairie, La., sent a foreman to Houston to round up 150 workers willing to do cleanup work for $15 an hour, more than twice their wages in Texas. The men -- most of whom are undocumented, according to news accounts -- live outside New Orleans in mobile homes without running water and electricity. The foreman expects them to stay "until there's no more work," but "there's going to be a lot of construction jobs for a really long time."

Because they are young and lack roots in the United States, many recent migrants are ideal for the explosion of construction jobs to come. Those living in the United States will relocate to the Gulf Coast, while others will come from south of the border. Most will not intend to stay where their new jobs are, but the longer the jobs last, the more likely it is that they will settle permanently.

One recent poll of New Orleans evacuees living in Houston emergency shelters found that fewer than half intend to return home. In part, their places will be taken by the migrant workers. Former President Clinton recently hinted as much on NBC's Meet the Press when he said that New Orleans will be resettled with a different population.

It is not the first time that hurricanes and other natural disasters have triggered population movements. In 1998, Hurricane Mitch slammed into Central America, sending waves of migrants northward. The 2001 earthquakes in El Salvador produced similar shifts.

The effects of Hurricane Andrew may better foretell New Orleans' future. The 1992 storm displaced 250,000 residents in southeastern Florida. The construction boom that followed attracted large numbers of Latin American immigrants, who rebuilt towns such as Homestead, whose Latino population has increased by 50 percent since then.

At the same time, U.S. construction companies have become increasingly reliant on Latino immigrant labor. In 1990, only 3.3 percent of construction workers were Mexican immigrants. Ten years later, the number was 8.5 percent. In 2004, 17 percent of Latino immigrants worked in the business, a higher percentage than in any other industry.

Reliance on immigrant labor to complete huge projects is part of U.S. history. In the early 19th century, mostly Irish immigrant laborers, who worked for as little as 37 1/2 cents an hour, built the Erie Canal, one of the greatest engineering feats of its day. Later that century, Italian immigrants, sometimes making just $1.50 a day, were the backbone of the work force that constructed the New York subway system.

In 1890, 90 percent of New York City's public works employees, and 99 percent of Chicago's street workers, were Italian.

After Congress authorized construction of the transcontinental railroad in 1862, one of the most ambitious projects in U.S. history, Charles Crocker, head of construction for the Central Pacific Railroad, recognized that the Civil War was creating a labor shortage. So he turned to Chinese immigrants. By 1867, 12,000 of Central Pacific's 13,500 workers were Chinese immigrants, who were paid between $26 and $35 for a six-day workweek of 12 hours a day.

At the turn of the 20th century, Mexican immigrant laborers did most of the railroad construction in Southern California, Arizona, New Mexico and Nevada.

The major difference between then and now is that neither the American public nor the government will admit their dependence on a labor force that is heavily undocumented. When Mexican President Vicente Fox offered to provide Mexican labor to help rebuild New Orleans -- "If there is anything Mexicans are good at, it is construction," he said -- the federal government ignored him. At the same time, some of the undocumented Mexicans who have cleaned up and begun to rebuild Biloxi, Miss., are wondering whether they deserve at least a temporary visa so they can live in the United States legally.
The White House recently said that it will push its plan to allow illegal immigrants already in the United States to become legal guest workers. Good. Hurricane Katrina exposed the nation's black-white divide. Post-Katrina reconstruction will soon spotlight the hypocrisy of refusing to grant legal status to those who will rebuild the Gulf Coast and New Orleans.

9/27/2005

NH Police fight aliens

Frustration can lead law enforcement into looking into other options to enforce laws, and that is precisely what New Ipswich Chief Garrett Chamberlain did. Using the no trespassing law, Chamberlain charged Jorge Mora Ramirez an illegal alien with trespassing. Ramirez was found with a fake ID and a Mexican driver’s license when his vehicle broke down back in April of this year.

L. Phillips Runyon of Jaffrey District Court had ruled the Chief’s actions were unconstitutional. The District judge stated only the federal government could enforce immigration laws. However, according to published reports, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE] did not want to take ‘workers’ into custody. ICE is the federal agency responsible for insuring immigration in the U.S. is legal. Recently President Bush’s appointment of Julie Meyer to head-up the department, the largest enforcement arm of Homeland Security has come under fire as being a political appointment.

The Runyon’s ruling has not deterred the stalwart police chief. Recently he was one of three featured speakers at a celebration of the signing of the Constitution featured by the New Hampshire Center for Constitutional Studies’. Other speakers included Rep. Tom Tancredo, [R-Colo.], a well known advocate for immigration reform and the founder of the Minuteman Project Jim Gilchrist.

In vowing to fight against illegal immigration, Chamberlain made a point to note that he would investigate a state law which prohibits employing illegal alien workers and fines the employer $1000 per day for each day the alien works. In addition, Chamberlain would like to see Attorney General Kelly Ayotte formulate a task force on illegal aliens.

Chamberlain has been with the New Ipswich Police Department since November 2002. He holds an Associates Degree in Criminal Justice and has been in law enforcement since 1993.

9/26/2005

CITIZENS UNITE

America is under “siege.� It only takes “common sense� to realize and recognize what the past years of uncontrolled illegal immigration is doing to our country. It is “common sense� that explains why our country's enhancement with “political correctness� is the “pathway to destruction.�

It is not “politically incorrect� to state that our problem is due in large part to: Mexicans, Latinos, Hispanics, Colombians, Venezuelans, etc., crossing our southern borders illegally. Who else would cross there? Icelanders? It is important to recognize that the majority of the states within our country are being razed by illegal aliens. It is not just our states bordering Mexico, it is Illinois, new York, new Hampshire, Michigan, etc., that are being traumatized by crime, failing educational systems, overwhelmed health care systems, gang intimidation, drugs, over-populated housing, and more. California is doomed unless governor Swarzennegor wakes up and takes action!

Amnesty, of any form, is not the answer! Amnesty will not educate, employ, or even ensure that illegal aliens register. It will only provide "special interests" lawyers with another antagonist to our legal system. Each and every one of you are responsible for ignoring this problem and managing our country with “gross negligence.� Your citizens are waiting for action and you refuse to listen to their demands that continue to amplify!


Our citizens are in danger from “out of control� gang activity, crime, drug activity, uninsured and non-licensed drivers, rapists and child molesters, burglary, larceny, etc. Our citizens are forced to subsidize these very same activities by paying high property and income taxes. Our veterans, seniors, poor, homeless, etc., suffer the effects of government funds allocated to support illegal aliens. Our children's education is decaying from non-english speaking students, and families that make their own “seasonal� school schedules. Finally, it is certain that potential terrorists and anti-Americans have and continue to, infiltrate our country, the “horrific� consequence of this fact upon our citizens shall surely come.

9/16/2005

Democrats are keen obstructionists!!!

Democrats are deeply conflicted about how to vote on the nomination of Judge John Roberts Jr. to be the 17th chief justice of the United States, and appear divided about how, and whether, to use their vote to send a message to President George W. Bush as he selects a candidate to fill a second Supreme Court vacancy.

Roberts' unflappable performance during three days of questioning has clearly put Democrats in a quandary. Some say a strong vote against his nomination could prod the White House into naming a centrist to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a crucial swing vote. Others say that supporting the Roberts nomination could make Democrats appear reasonable, giving them more credibility to oppose the next nominee.

As the Judiciary Committee wrapped up its questioning of Roberts on Thursday morning, Democrats, who have repeatedly assailed the nominee for not being forthcoming, expressed obvious frustration. Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, told Roberts that she had "one impression of you when we had our hour in private," and another at the hearing.

That angst is spilling over into the rest of the Democratic caucus, and no Democrat interviewed Thursday would commit one way or the other on the vote. Reid said that six of the eight Democrats on the judiciary panel had conferred, but were still undecided.
Representatives of liberal advocacy groups, who are pressing Democrats to oppose the nomination, said they felt confident of a straight party-line vote, or close to it, when the committee takes up the nomination next Thursday.

The vote will come as Democrats sense Bush is vulnerable. His poll numbers are at the lowest point of his presidency amid public outrage over the federal government's response to Hurricane Katrina. Democrats hope to turn that outrage into a powerful message to voters during the 2006 midterm elections.

But Democrats are keenly aware that they risk being labeled obstructionist if they vote in a bloc against a nominee like Roberts, whose legal qualifications are impeccable. And though they have complained bitterly that the White House has refused to provide them access to legal memorandums Roberts wrote when he worked for the first Bush administration, Democrats appear to have little appetite to block the nomination by filibuster on the Senate floor.
Roberts' unflappable performance during three days of questioning has clearly put Democrats in a quandary. Some say a strong vote against his nomination could prod the White House into naming a centrist to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a crucial swing vote. Others say that supporting the Roberts nomination could make Democrats appear reasonable, giving them more credibility to oppose the next nominee.

9/15/2005

Local, state, and Federal: Whats going on?

I can understand why CNN, MSNBC, FoxNews, John Stewart, and all the other left-wing liberal media that hate President Bush tainting certain facts. Hopefully, partisan politics are not getting in the way of getting these facts straight. Bush declared a state of emergency before the storm, and then the federal government suggested assistance immediately after the storm. The federal government does not have the authority under U.S. law to commit or send troops or National Guardsmen to any locale until the governor requests and/or approves such assistance. But the assistance was delayed for days by an indecisive governor Blanco.

Is it the Bush administration's fault that every New Orleans school bus now sits under water, unused to evacuate citizens who, either by their own choice or by their inability to evacuate, remained in the city after the storm? Where does the responsibility of the mayor of New Orleans lie in this? Mayor Ray Nagin has been parading around on television networks complaining about the government, but he couldn’t, and still can’t enforce a mandatory evacuation. Is it the Bush administration’s fault that people did not evacuate (nor still have not) when “ordered� under mandatory evacuation?Is it the Bush administration’s fault that the governor of Louisiana did not activate her National Guard in a timely manner? The National Guard is under direct state control, and it appears that the governor of Louisiana did not activate it in mass force until 2½ to three days after the storm hit.

Is it the Bush administration’s fault that up to 400 New Orleans police officers left their post and ran away from the recovery process, some being a part of the looting process? I wonder if New Orleans police chief Eddie Compass has started an investigation into his officers and himself, and the actions during and after the hurricane. And to make things worse, Eddie Compass is still the chief trying to maintain law and order. If he couldn’t do it then, then why should we trust him now? When is this man facing re-election?

Pretty soon we will be reading that the Bush administration is to blame for the hurricane hitting the U.S. mainland. I believe that the mayor of New Orleans and the governor of Louisiana showed very poor leadership and let their constituents down. It is easy to blame the federal government for all the ills in our society. The majority of the left-wing media would lead us to believe that. Yes, assistance was much too slow than should be acceptable for a host of reasons. FEMA did not respond as it should have and yes, in the end, there will be plenty of people to blame, much finger pointing will be done and department/agency managers will be held accountable.

9/02/2005

Media blinders

Unknown to millions of interested Americans, a judge on thursday ordered the conditional release of a Dutch teenager in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, but he remains a suspect, his defense attorney said. Joran van der Sloot, 18, could be released from jail as early as Saturday and remain free pending the outcome of the probe. The Kalpoe brothers were released on July 4 but were re-arrested last week. The announcement came a day after a hearing in which Carlo argued that prosecutors have produced no evidence that his client was involved in Holloway's disappearance or that a crime had been committed. A judge ordered Satish Kalpoe to remain jailed another eight days, said government spokesman Ruben Trapenberg said, without giving further details. The judge was still to rule on whether to continue holding or release Deepak Satish. Suspects can be detained for 116 days without charge in the Dutch Caribbean island.

Unfortunately, the only ‘news worthy’ stories in the United States is testimonials and pictures from hurricane Katrina, and gas prices. Yes it is unfortunate what happened to gulf coast residents in Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, and Florida, but that is the coast of living next to the ocean, and not paying attention to evacuation notices. The only good thing that came out of the hurricane is the disappearance of anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan. Hopefully she was and will stay littered with the rest of the garbage.

Less traumatic then a hurricane was the media coverage given to the Natalee Holloway case in Aruba. At first the media and public were sure it was the two security officers. Showing the total incompetence of the Aruban government was the looney “Twiggy�. She called into question the three teenage witnesses, and later learned they may be prime suspects. But now into the stage of proving the case, the lack of evidence is becoming more evident. Yes you can say you think this person may be guilt, but the accused has a right to a trial.