tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8463698.post113822580373495987..comments2023-09-30T11:31:11.638-04:00Comments on Joey's Buzz: Rude Letter from Rep. Tom PrezelskiJoey Beehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14779286945229159029noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8463698.post-1138395112111929282006-01-27T15:51:00.000-05:002006-01-27T15:51:00.000-05:00I'm very surprised Joey admitted he was wrong. I t...I'm very surprised Joey admitted he was wrong. I tried to call Tom today, but it seems like he blew me off. Last time I vote for him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8463698.post-1138340491617187662006-01-27T00:41:00.000-05:002006-01-27T00:41:00.000-05:00My mistake, I should have analyzed the property do...My mistake, I should have analyzed the property documents more. I am man enough to admit I made a mistake. But I do stand by the court documents and that Thomas Edward Prezelski Jr. is a criminal, and maybe a felon.Joey Beehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14779286945229159029noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8463698.post-1138330260047804702006-01-26T21:51:00.000-05:002006-01-26T21:51:00.000-05:00Looks like Joey found a button to push. Thank god ...Looks like Joey found a button to push. <BR/><BR/>Thank god for free speach!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8463698.post-1138308958536919362006-01-26T15:55:00.000-05:002006-01-26T15:55:00.000-05:00Neither one of the addresses you posted was mine (...Neither one of the addresses you posted was mine (They aren't even in my district). My mother has already received two crank phone calls from somebody. I ask that you remove this erroneous "personal information" before some other innocent party gets caught up in this little tiff.<BR/><BR/>TomAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8463698.post-1138271675269959132006-01-26T05:34:00.000-05:002006-01-26T05:34:00.000-05:00Thanks for the info, I hate this guy. I'm going to...Thanks for the info, I hate this guy. I'm going to give him a call at home since he never returns my call at his office.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8463698.post-1138266107590897972006-01-26T04:01:00.000-05:002006-01-26T04:01:00.000-05:00Arizona Daily Star - Published on: 7/29/2005 Issu...Arizona Daily Star - Published on: 7/29/2005 <BR/><BR/>Issued: August 5, 2005 - Arizona <BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>Arizona Rep. Tom Prezelski, Jr.'s role as the suspect in a Tucson felony fraud investigation will likely not result in an investigation at the Capitol. House Speaker Jim Weiers is not interested in calling for an investigation by the House ethics panel, said Barrett Marson, spokesperson for the House leadership. Marson said House ethics investigations are usually called for offenses related to the member's position in the House – a conflict-of-interest, for example. The panel will also conduct an investigation if a person with firsthand knowledge of the offense files a complaint with the committee, said Marson. Prezelski attributed his problems partly to a pay cut he took when he was appointed to the House of Representatives in February 2003. Prezelski said he now has his finances straightened out and he does not believe the problems have affected his job. The Tucson police fraud investigation is in response to a report to police by a friend of Prezelski's that he had stolen a blank check from her, made it out for about $10,000, and forged her signature in June 2003. No charges have been issued in the case, although it is still an open investigation. <BR/><BR/>-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<BR/><BR/>Of course if Arizona Rep. Tom Prezelski, Jr. was a regular citizen criminal charges would have been filed for theft, identity theft, and bank fraud. But since he has connections no action will ever be taken. After seeing this , who can say justice is blind?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8463698.post-1138237281380877312006-01-25T20:01:00.000-05:002006-01-25T20:01:00.000-05:00Dear Mr. BeeGiven the usual rough and tumble of in...Dear Mr. Bee<BR/><BR/>Given the usual rough and tumble of internet debates I must say I don't find Tom P.'s letter <I>particularly</I> rude. You could, of course, have kept it from general distribution by not posting it yourself.<BR/><BR/>As to your claim that he is a felon I'm not sure...is that libel or slander? I've never been able to keep the two separated, myself.Art Jacobsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14354951975503040483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8463698.post-1138228685841931502006-01-25T17:38:00.000-05:002006-01-25T17:38:00.000-05:00I have met Rep. Tom Prezelski in person before, an...I have met Rep. Tom Prezelski in person before, and he was very rude even though I told him I voted for him. Which I did.<BR/><BR/>But I have come to the realization that he wants to push an anti-American agenda, and help Mexico and illegals as much as he can.<BR/><BR/>I wonder if you is a legal citizen. Maybe ICE should investigate him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com